Medicaid benefits politicians more than it benefits citizens
Published in The Tennessean, Sunday, March 17, 2013 and the full version at FORBES with archives.
Richard J. Grant
Richard J. Grant is a Professor of Finance and Economics at Lipscomb University and a Senior Fellow at the Beacon Center of Tennessee. His column appears fortnightly on Sundays. E-mail messages received at: rjg@richardjgrant.com
Follow on Twitter @richardjgrant1
Richard J. Grant
In how many
states have the governors or legislators claimed that their state would be a
net beneficiary of federal spending for Medicaid expansion? There are
supporters of Medicaid expansion in all 50 states who do make such claims. But not
everyone can be a net beneficiary of subsidization.
When
redistribution is the game, someone must be a net contributor. What becomes important
here is that the burdens borne by such contributors are not necessarily
relevant to the decision process. The question of whether Medicaid expansion
brings net benefits to a state is a less-useful predictor of a state
politician’s actions than is the expected effect of that expansion on the politician’s
reelection chances. ...
Richard J. Grant is a Professor of Finance and Economics at Lipscomb University and a Senior Fellow at the Beacon Center of Tennessee. His column appears fortnightly on Sundays. E-mail messages received at: rjg@richardjgrant.com
Follow on Twitter @richardjgrant1